Tracked shipping to Taiwan with premium packaging for just NT$300 

Ship to
Taiwan
0

My Account

  • argentina
  • chile
  • colombia
  • españa
  • méxico
  • perú
  • estados unidos
  • internacional

menu

Select your country

Americas

Europe

Rest of the world

portada Does the Municipal Participation Fund influence Development?
Type
Physical Book
Author
Publisher
Language
English
Pages
208
Format
Paperback
Dimensions
22.9 x 15.2 x 1.2 cm
Weight
0.31 kg.
ISBN13
9786205878286
Categories

Does the Municipal Participation Fund influence Development?

Clarice Pereira de Paiva Ribeiro (Author) · Luiz Antônio Abrantes (Author) · Our Knowledge Publishing · Paperback

Does the Municipal Participation Fund influence Development? - Ribeiro, Clarice Pereira de Paiva ; Abrantes, Luiz Antônio

New Book Imported to Taiwan *
Delivery: 28 Apr - 11 May Shipping: 7 to 11 business days.
NT$ 2,907
NT$ 2,907
Delivery to any Taiwan address between Tuesday, April 28 and Monday, May 11
Origin: United Kingdom Import costs included in the price ✅
Delivery to any Taiwan address between Tuesday, April 28 and Monday, May 11.

Choose the list to add your product or create one New List

Go to My Wishlists
Calculate shipping cost

Synopsis "Does the Municipal Participation Fund influence Development?"

In Brazil the system of intergovernmental transfers is used to correct imbalances and reduce socioeconomic inequality. In this study, we evaluated the implications of the Municipal Participation Fund (FPM-Interior) on the socioeconomic development of municipalities, considering its distribution policies from 1967 to 2031. The presence of the flypaper effect in the distribution of this fund was also analyzed. And also, the relationship between intergovernmental transfers, mainly the FPM-Interior, and level of socioeconomic development of municipalities from 2005 to 2016 was examined. The dependence by the municipalities on the revenues of the FPM-Interior was proven. The flypaper effect was observed, suggesting an expansive effect of these resources on public spending and inefficiency in its application. In relation to the applicability of the FPM-Interior apportionment criteria (18 population ranges), we infer that the population factor is not adequate as an indicator of socioeconomic development and is biased. We conclude that there is a need to revise the current criteria for apportioning the Inland FPM, incorporating mechanisms that verify other aspects besides population and income.

Customers reviews

More customer reviews
  • 0% (0)
  • 0% (0)
  • 0% (0)
  • 0% (0)
  • 0% (0)

Frequently Asked Questions about the Book

Is the book original?

All books in our catalog are Original.

In what language is the book written?

The book is written in English.

What is the format of this book?

The binding of this edition is Paperback.

Questions and Answers about the Book

Do you have a question about the book? Login to be able to add your own question.

Opinions about Bookdelivery

More customer reviews