The challenges of modernization for any military in the contemporary operating environment are difficult with even the most professional and well-financed of militaries. Not only are the costs of research and development prohibitive in attempting to address the entire spectrum of evolving threats, but the consequences of making the wrong decisions can betray the US Army its most precious commodity; the lives of its soldiers. This study examines the current US Army efforts at cavalry transformation and some of the assumptions supporting this transformation. This study questions whether any recent historical examples in maneuver warfare actually support the logic behind the recent decisions to radically alter the role of cavalry. This study poses the central question: Are the new reconnaissance squadrons adequately equipped or organized to answer the needs of the new modular brigade combat teams? This thesis examines what some of the most significant examples of mechanized cavalry operations over the last sixty-five years demonstrate regarding the fundamental linkages between reconnaissance and security in modern maneuver warfare. Exposing some of the flawed assumptions imbedded in current transformation efforts is a worthy exercise, as is also the consideration of how to best adjust these new reconnaissance squadrons to make them more capable.This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
